A number of similarities, connections, affinities, is running in my head a bit 'of time and although I have not yet discussed the issue I want Meanwhile, share these ideas, even to see if other connections, similarities, similarities of this kind come to mind to readers of this post.
start with the transcendental Medieval: everything, says Thomas, because it is such a , true, good .
Being , truth and good says Franca D'Agostini (in The Last Fumes ) are the three fundamental philosophical concepts, the three concepts can not be eliminated, inaggirabili.
When it comes to draw a synthesis on what are the basic types of objects, the basic types of existence, or of objectivity, some of the twentieth century and contemporary authors seem to rely on one another
- Ferraris recently proposed a catalog the world divided into natural objects , ideal objects and social objects
- Popper has proposed three distinct worlds: the physical objects, that of the experienced (psychological) and that of cultural objectivity.
- Frege distinguished between physical events, mental events and logical objects
- Penrose distinguishes the mathematical world (Platonic), the physical and the mental world, only a small part of the mathematical world is important to explain the physical world, but throughout the physical world seems to be governed by mathematical laws, only a small part of the physical world gives rise to mental activities, but all activities have an underlying mental physics, only a small part of mental math about the world, but the whole world seems to have originated by the mental math ... (How is it that each world seems to include everything in the world following a paradoxical circularity triangular?)
trichotomies These ontologies may be reconsidered in the light of the three categories of science in natural sciences , exact sciences, historical and social sciences. Each type of science has its own kind of objectivity of interest: physical-chemical-biological entities, logical-mathematical entities, human actions and their products.
You can also groped for a match between the three categories of science mentioned above and the three fundamental concepts of philosophy according to D'Agostini: the exact sciences are concerned, after all, a fundamental value: the truth ; the natural sciences seek incessantly to capture the ' be (what actually exists), the historical and social sciences, as focused on human actions and their products, have the right (individual, collective, or understood as quality of products human) as a background of values \u200b\u200balways assumes or explicitly investigated.
In the large tripartite division of Hegelian system are once again a restatement of the three transcendentals: the idea (truth), Nature (to be), the Spirit (good).
The triad of values \u200b\u200bof the French Revolution: liberty, equality and solidarity. Even here, after all, an analogy with the freedom to be (a), equality with the truth ( correspondence between ...), solidarity with good!
find more similarities or matches of this kind?
find more similarities or matches of this kind?
There are many triads in philosophical thought, but here we go I think the corresponding ontological-knowledge-values \u200b\u200bthat seem to be deepened and we go in, I believe in love for the number 3 seems to have thought that the intrinsic characteristic: the tripartite soul in Plato (and the corresponding three-part division into social classes), the tripartite division of the Freudian topical, the three modes of existence for Kierkegaard, the three ways out of the will for Schopenhauer, the three Kantian critique (and the corresponding three fundamental questions of man), the Trinity in Christian theology, the law of three stages of Comte ... Other
3 in philosophy?
0 comments:
Post a Comment