report here, to guide the response to the question posed in the title, some basic thesis of the text logic of nihilism of Franca D'Agostini (Laterza 2000).
The author believes that the term "nihilism" has two main meanings are interrelated. The first is the idea of \u200b\u200bthe need a transcending of the dimension in which there is (language, thought, world history, right ...) but accompanied by the impossibility of making real the difficulty of staying within a certain size, but with not being able to get out (from Kant onwards). The second is pluralism, the rule of the difference, the idea that there are no general orders or hierarchies of value and meaning because you can not (more) refer to the whole, whole, at all (Nietzsche: "the everything is not everything ") and have primacy singularity, part, detail. So
"nihilism" = 1. the truth does not exist + 2. there are many possible truths
The author believes that the term "nihilism" has two main meanings are interrelated. The first is the idea of \u200b\u200bthe need a transcending of the dimension in which there is (language, thought, world history, right ...) but accompanied by the impossibility of making real the difficulty of staying within a certain size, but with not being able to get out (from Kant onwards). The second is pluralism, the rule of the difference, the idea that there are no general orders or hierarchies of value and meaning because you can not (more) refer to the whole, whole, at all (Nietzsche: "the everything is not everything ") and have primacy singularity, part, detail. So
"nihilism" = 1. the truth does not exist + 2. there are many possible truths
0 comments:
Post a Comment