Half Head Highlights On Brown Hair

The sense of the question "What exists?". Achille Varzi reading ...




I think the fundamental ontological question can be reformulated as follows: "In which of the things that you can name, are the entities in the world and what other things exist beyond those that are included in the our language? " Using the terminology of
Achille C. Varzi, in some cases is to "eliminate the volume of work" (when the philosophy is suffering from "hallucinations"), others to "introduce hidden entities" (when you suffer from "myopia") (AC Varzi, The world in focus . stories of hallucinations and philosophical myopia , Laterza, 2010).
But then, if so, why continue to answer the question "What exists?", "There is more." (Quine's answer, which makes its Varzi)? The same
Varzi said that there are differences in height, the average household, the odds, bad luck, the Platonic ideas, meanings, numbers ... (P. 43). So in reality for him there are many things, but rejects the theory of nonexistent objects (line-Berto Meinong).
On the other hand said "there is everything" seems equivalent to reject a fundamental aspect of the ontological question. If we interpret it as "There is all that exists is an empty tautology, if we interpret as" there is anything we are talking about " is a thesis that neither Quine nor Varzi have never claimed.
Perhaps out of this situation, we must recognize that the meaning of the verb to be is not unique, and therefore we are things we are talking about but not exist in the world.